<p>Contact me for <a href="https://thetravelnotes.com/en">thetravelnotes.com</a> feedback or questions! I reply to everybody.</p><p>Technological slavery</p><p>Introduction</p><p>Technology is inseparable from civilization. It has changed the world endlessly. Due to it, we will, for instance, send information to the opposite finish of the world in seconds; discuss to folks from different continents; travel to any place on the planet in in the future; retailer hundreds of pictures on a drive the scale of your thumb; create virtual realities, as well as do a bunch of other things that nobody would have imagined just a hundred years in the past.</p><p>But expertise has its bad aspect too. In the current world, it is controlled by organizations who wouldn't have our best interests in thoughts. They won't hesitate to make use of expertise's nice power in opposition to us. Spying on - and analyzing - our communication; controlling the information we receive; emotional manipulation; modification of conduct - those are only a few issues know-how is being used for nowadays. All that with more protection, accuracy, effectiveness and with much less human effort. If this "progress" shouldn't be stopped, we will end up in a prison that we wouldn't discover in our worst nightmares.</p><p>I'll attempt to explain the way in which a very powerful technologies of in the present day contribute to the creation of a global system of control. I may even mention a few technologies of the longer term, and take a look at to attach all the information together and predict the destiny of this world. Let's begin with one of many inventions that affect people probably the most - The Internet.</p><p>The Internet</p><p>Every connection, for example sending a message, or getting into a website, goes via your Internet Service Provider, earlier than it reaches the goal. In idea this implies ISPs can freely spy on and modify all the things you do on the web; for instance - decelerate or block the downloading of torrents; inject advertisements to your visited sites http://zmhenkel.blogspot.com/2013/03/isp-commercial-injection-cma.html (archive) (MozArchive), or even create a massive censorship system, like the so-referred to as "Great Wall" of China.</p><p>The most typical utilization of the Internet is browsing web sites, for which we use a web browser resembling Mozilla Firefox, Internet Explorer or Google Chrome. These three "giants" pretty much exist to collect information on their users. Google no less than admits to it - however, Mozilla pretends to care about your freedom and privateness, however really spies on you and controls you. It's been a couple of years since Mozilla determined they may resolve what add-ons you may and can't set up - apparently to "protect the users", however nothing stops them from, for instance, disabling AdBlock. Mozilla has labored with advertisers for a very long time - they've even proven them in your New Tab panel: https://weblog.mozilla.org/advancingcontent/2015/05/21/providing-a-useful-platform-for-advertisers-content material-publishers-and-users/ (archive) (MozArchive). The myth of Firefox "respecting the user" has died and will not resurrect. Just read a sure reply from their web site: Our merchandise don't interrupt the shopping experience; they catch customers when they're most receptive to seeing new data. So, for them, you might be simply prey to be caught for the aim of having ads be shoved into your brain. Despite that, they still spew slogans about "respect and freedom". I might spend the entire article on pointing out all of the methods in style web browsers exploit you. Opera, for example, literally spies on your entire web historical past without your knowledge. The three giants talked about earlier additionally spy on you, but in another ways.</p><p>Almost every huge web site works intently with the police / authorities and will fortunately share data about you with them - for example, the IP address of the computer you made a forum put up from. Exceptions, resembling Lavabit (interesting story by the way in which - you possibly can read it on the web) or The Pirate Bay, have their servers raided.</p><p>Lately, it grew to become fashionable to retailer your information "in the cloud", for example Dropbox or Google Drive. This is basically helpful to the elites - they can now see and analyze your recordsdata, which can give them details about your pursuits or plans (which could be used against you). One man from 4chan was storing bomb making directions on Dropbox, only to search out that, at some point, they've been deleted. The Internet is filled with instances like that, and they're not all about bombs. Thus, we will see that your data is not protected on these cloud "providers" - it ceases being yours. Almost certainly, in a number of years, wanting to maintain your data on your own drive might be thought of "abnormal" - and cloud storage will probably be the standard - like it's in the present day with money vs financial institution accounts, for instance. This may open the door to finish management of your saved knowledge, robotically blocking materials about - for instance - the aforementioned bombs. Another, possibly more plausible choice, would be punishing the individuals who add such information - like movie producers did with individuals downloading certain torrents.</p><p>Google</p><p>How do most people find information on the internet? Using Google, of course. But Google is something more than only a search engine - it's a corporation whose aim is gathering as a lot knowledge as doable and making a profile about you. Their spy scripts (for instance, google analytics) exist pretty much on every site - you might even not know what Google is, however nonetheless be spied on. That knowledge is then used to, for instance, show you focused ads, but also different search results. So a Christian looking for "abortion" will see one thing else than an atheist.</p><p>Google went additional and invented a new algorithm for displaying search outcomes. The websites who are, based on them, based on "info" will probably be greater up. Alternatively, those that include untrue information (again, in response to them) can be additional down. One of the ways Google rates the truth value of sites is evaluating them with the articles on Wikipedia. And since we know the way Wikipedia treats conspiracy theories, we are able to assume they'll pushed away by official versions of occasions. Soon, after we search for something like "genetically modified organisms" we are going to only get "ready" info. Google's invention might change into one in all the best instruments of censorship and opinion control.</p><p>Google additionally controls other frequent companies. Certainly one of the most popular is YouTube, which they've been "reforming" since they purchased it. I used to be stunned when a few years ago I couldn't log in to my YouTube account without making a Gmail account. I did not need their e-mail (which spies on you) so I mentioned goodbye to YouTube. I did not use it a lot, however nonetheless.</p><p>Another YouTube reform known as Content ID. It's supposed to protect copyright. The creator of a film or track can share their creation with Google, which will then evaluate it with every other file on YouTube. If it considers one of those files close sufficient to the submission, it can both delete that file, remove sound from it, or add commercials.</p><p>- Nintendo was able to place advertisements on some movies showcasing their video games: http://www.destructoid.com/nintendo-is-claiming-possession-of-let-s-play-movies-253793.phtml (archive) (MozArchive)- An individual uploaded some birds singing. Content ID assumed it was some copyright protected song, and added advertisements to it, which earned the creator of the nonexistent music cash. https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120227/00152917884/man-gets-bogus-youtube-copyright-claim-birds-singing-background.shtml (archive) (MozArchive)- Some corporation even put advertisements on someone else's song, and earned money from it: https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20150317/10513630347/umg-licenses-indie-artists-monitor-then-makes use of-content-id-to-claim-possession-it.shtml (archive) (MozArchive)</p><p>Before Content ID was invented, somebody who thought that a movie violates copyright, needed to send YouTube a type, which may very well be accepted or not. Lately though, they have a a lot easier means called Content ID, which permits them to earn money if it finds some similarities. You can theoretically enchantment a Content ID determination, however it's pointless since the enchantment will be decided by...the identical firm that uploaded the file. Many annoyed people are complaining in internet feedback, saying that Content ID is horrible, that it made a mistake with their movie, that they are stealing their cash, that they have lost their information or their account. There've been debates about copyright and AI generally. Some individuals have stated that movie or music creators should be comfortable to have their content shared on YouTube. But these discussions can exist only as a result of Content ID occurred. Without it, folks may freely share their movies with out them being presumably modified / deleted by computerized analysis.</p><p>An identical program may very well be used to delete movies about undesirable subjects. Even now YouTube is deleting "racist", "nationalist", "insulting" films - even when usually that is simply an excuse; however they need to do it by hand. In the event that they put together Content ID with the site sorting algorithm, they may create a system that deletes sure content routinely. A more superior form of that algorithm could even delete certain elements of films which have undesirable topics (for instance, deleting a couple of second long part with a racist slur). It might work similar to the profanity filters on boards. But it surely would not be restricted solely to that - Google has proven, that they're very interested in controlling your beliefs, after they've created the location sorting algorithm I spoke about earlier. A tool that would detect where in your movie an undesirable subject is mentioned, and substitute it with their modified version, would be very welcome of their arsenal.</p><p>You can write a whole e book about Google; I do not wish to do it - but I need to briefly mention another issues they've accomplished. Recaptcha is the preferred way to defend forums from spambots. In case you needed to write down something on a discussion board with recaptcha, you had to type a sure word. You did not all the time get a word, although - you may get one thing like a avenue deal with, which would then get added to Google StreetView, which permits spying on individuals. For years, anyone who wrote on 4chan, was filling their database with street addresses, whereas not essentially knowing about that. What actually is StreetView? Google cars travel the world taking pictures of everything and everybody. Then they put these pictures in their database, which may be searched by anyone. Google has entry to pictures of the whole Earth, just about - and even to the historical past of places folks seek for using their maps. What could that information be used for? You can read on Wikipedia that loads of international locations had an issue with StreetView. They thought it intrudes on the citizen's privacy. But after "consultations" they've all agreed to allow it. Isn't this evidence that we're coping with a worldwide plan to spy on folks?</p><p>They've changed ReCaptcha since I wrote the above. Now, you get a set of photos and you have to choose the ones containing a sure merchandise, for example hamburgers. This is used to prepare Google's synthetic intelligence, which will even probably be used against us sooner or later. I'll end this part with a quote from Google We do not want you to kind in any respect. We all know where you might be. We all know where you have been. We will more or less know what you're occupied with.</p><p>Social networks</p><p>Considered one of the most popular internet websites today are social networks, comparable to Facebook or Twitter. People flock to them like flies, filling their databases with information resembling identify, surname, cellphone number, place of labor, interests, and pal lists. They do not have an issue with sharing their political opinions. Facebook makes it really easy, for the reason that Like! button appears on hottest websites, and clicking it sends data to Facebook about the article you liked. How might they use that data? For instance, for displaying targeted advertisements. A couple of years in the past, Facebook promised that it would by no means try this - but then changed their thoughts and it is now a actuality. A few of these commercials will be insulting - for instance, an individual affected by cancer, after searching for information about it on the web, was proven advertisements about...burial companies! http://www.naturalnews.com/049386_Facebook_privateness_surveillance.html (archive) (MozArchive)</p><p>Comments written on these social networks are much more dangerous. They're attached to your real name, and whoever finds your account can read them. What might be the consequences of that? You possibly can lose your job or be arrested. Some examples:</p><p>- A person was arrested for posting lyrics of a heavy metallic track on Twitter. The federal government thought he was actually threatening to kill folks and he was arrested. This incident was described intimately here: https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20140906/13490628443/heavy-steel-lyrics-posted-to-fb-result-arrest-terrorist-threats.shtml (archive) (MozArchive)- A waitress lost their job 48 hours after complaining on Facebook that she's earning too little in suggestions. http://www.inc.com/information/articles/2010/05/waitress-fired-for-facebook-publish.html (archive) (MozArchive)</p><p>We might be specializing in singular conditions - was somebody punished appropriately or not? You possibly can even blame the victim. But the logical thing to do is to look at the whole subject from afar. If these comments had been made in person, and never on the internet, nobody may have gotten in hassle. The potential of punishing someone is the consequence of the know-how that attaches the things you submit to your title. After years of using social networks, you could possibly find something on anybody, even if he did not suppose that the message he is writing would have given him issues later.</p><p>300 employers had been asked whether or not they've checked the profiles of their would-be recruits, and 91% agreed. 69% dismissed an worker because of something he had in his profile. A number of the offending issues have been: unfavourable opinions about previous employers, photos of using medication or drinking alcohol, or "inappropriate" images.</p><p>There are also extra direct ways in which the social networks can affect you. In 2014 Facebook did a psychological experiment that was supposed to indicate you can management human minds without knowing them personally, and without their knowledge. 689003 folks (who weren't aware of being lab rats) have been divided into two teams - one in every of them was shown solely content generating constructive emotions, the other - solely destructive. The more positive content material someone saw, the more positively he himself responded. The differences were small, however maybe they could possibly be elevated with more drastic measures. For instance, exhibiting someone articles about murders or kidnappings. You might additionally goal the content somebody was going to be proven individually - based upon the things he's written in his profile, or his looking history (which Facebook collects through the Like! buttons). If somebody reads a variety of anti-government web sites, they can be proven articles about the federal government doing something bad. Or an anti-GMO person would be proven information about GMOs being legalized someplace. It's plausible that this experiment opened the door to only this kind of factor. You'll be able to learn the whole experiment here: http://www.pnas.org/content material/111/24/8788.full (archive) (MozArchive)</p><p>Facebook additionally makes use of an algorithm for detecting faces on photographs and mechanically adding a name to them. http://www.dailydot.com/expertise/fb-deepface-science/ (archive) (MozArchive). If your title is on at the least one photograph, every different photograph together with your face might be detected as you.</p><p>Communication and encryption</p><p>Increasingly more human communication is finished electronically. This has the identical problem as financial institution accounts - you pay for a basic human want. But that is not an important. A human talking eye to eye is spontaneous. He is aware of solely the particular person he is speaking to can hear him. Then he brings that attitude in the direction of talking within the telephone, which follows completely different guidelines - all knowledge about when, where, and to whom you made the call is saved within the supplier's database. In most international locations the police has access to the information if they've the court order. But in Great Britain - the chief of digital spying - three of four most used suppliers send all their knowledge to police in actual time: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/oct/10/automated-police-access-customers-mobile-phone-information-like-money-machine-ripa-three-ee-vodafone/ (archive) (MozArchive). The implications are monumental - the same group (the police) who can fine or punish you, now has access to all of your cellphone calls. People have been locked up for SMS messages before, however often they had to bodily search their telephones. This requirement disappears with the automatic system of sending messages to police.</p><p>The same is true of web communication. Most people use frequent tools like Gmail or Skype. In certainly one of his leaked documents, Edward Snowden revealed that the NSA (National Security of America) has a program known as PRISM, with which those corporations cooperate. Since 2011, Skype offers entry to your conversations to the NSA, together with video recording:</p><p>Of course, we may use much less standard software with an encryption capability, but would that protect us from spying?</p><p>David Cameron, the prime minister of Great Britain, got here up with an idea to ban encryption, arguing that There needs to be no means of communication, which we cannot learn. Many people laughed, saying that the government would have to delete encryption software program from individuals's hard drives (and would that basically be a problem for them? Malware exists, you already know). Others thought that they can't implement it, as a result of it could make banking and such insecure. But this looks extra like a desperate way to dismiss the likelihood that, in the close to future, all our conversations completed electronically shall be spied on by the government.</p><p>In another leak of NSA's paperwork, it was proven that they want to cut back the effectiveness of widespread encryption:</p><p>You needn't work with a software's creator to spy on our conversations, although. Even in open supply software program (that anyone with sufficient information and dedication can inspect), there nonetheless happen bugs that may weaken the encryption. For instance, OpenSSL, the most well-liked library encrypting our communications with websites, for 1.5 years had a bug allowing to download a small amount of information from the reminiscence of the server that it's used on, and that data might embody passwords and encryption keys. NSA, of course, took advantage of that: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2014-04-11/nsa-said-to-have-used-heartbleed-bug-exposing-customers (archive) (MozArchive) Another instance: Cryptocat screwed up the implementation of an encryption algorithm, which allowed anyone with enough capability to decrypt communication made with it. And NSA has these capabilities - they also save all encrypted communications, to allow them to decrypt it later.</p><p>And they're going to most certainly succeed - there is a huge likelihood that quantum computers will make all present ciphers irrelevant - https://hackaday.com/2015/09/29/quantum-computing-kills-encryption/ (archive) (MozArchive) - so non-public conversations will be a factor of the past. Add to that voice recognition software program, and we're discovering ourselves in a world where all our conversations are looked for certain phrases (by a program just like Content ID I've talked about earlier).</p><p>Electronic banking</p><p>Cash funds are increasingly more usually being replaced by electronic ones. People like the consolation of with the ability to order anything they want and pay for it with a couple of clicks. Having a checking account is one thing regular these days, even required. But behind the curtain conceal gigantic implications for human privateness and freedom.</p><p>Let's start from the basics - what's digital money? It's a quantity in a database on a server belonging to the financial institution you are utilizing. Your skill to buy anything depends on how big that number is - and since humans have to, for instance, eat - your life depends on it. How a lot digital money you will have relies on a number of stuff you cannot affect - simply using a bank account prices money, so collaborating on this system means you mechanically lose it.</p><p>A bank can eat much more of your money - even without considering hacking attacks like this: https://thehackernews.com/2016/05/swift-banking-hack.html (archive) (MozArchive), the place the hackers stole 12 million dollars. One man from Cyprus got 720 000 Euros stolen by the european commission to pay off Cyprus' debt. He needed to hearth all his Cypriot employees and move to a different nation. First, the sum was displayed as "blocked", then they deleted it altogether from his account. And, as he himself says, Thousands of different corporations around Cyprus have the same state of affairs. This exhibits how much you may depend on a quantity in a database - all it takes is one thought in somebody's mind, and it is gone. Read extra about this matter here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?matter=160292 (archive) (MozArchive)</p><p>Another problem with digital funds is the truth that they're anti-privacy. All your transactions are stored within the bank's database. And the folks controlling the financial institution can use it against you - blocking undesirable transactions, equivalent to buying bitcoins http://www.coindesk.com/dutch-bank-rabobank-blocks-bitcoin/ (archive) (MozArchive) or donations to WikiLeaks: http://www.bankrate.com/finance/credit score-cards/naughty-things-credit-card-wont-buy-6.aspx (archive) (MozArchive). It's easy to think about a world where all of your transactions are analyzed and robotically blocked in response to an inventory of banned objects.</p><p>Paper money doesn't have that drawback. It won't disappear from your pocket. There isn't a central level that shops information about your transactions. You cannot "turn somebody off" if he pays with paper cash - if someone does not need to sell you something, you go somewhere else. Paper cash is a software of the free particular person - that is why the elites are concentrating on it.</p><p>But you possibly can still use paper cash, proper? Maybe not for lengthy - they have been making an attempt to get people used to digital payments for a long time. Advertising bank accounts is commonplace. Increasingly more employers require having a checking account. The boundaries on the amount you can spend without delay with paper cash are going down worldwide:</p><p>Will they go right down to zero? In some places that is already the case; for instance, buses in London can't be paid for in money since three years ago. The amount of cashless locations will increase, and folks can be tied up in the digital internet of slavery.</p><p>2017 replace: since writing the above, the state of affairs has got a lot worse. In Sweden, funds are almost fully digital: https://www.theguardian.com/enterprise/2016/jun/04/sweden-cashless-society-playing cards-telephone-apps-leading-europe (archive) (MozArchive) - Swedish buses haven't taken money for years, it is inconceivable to buy a ticket on the Stockholm metro with money, retailers are legally entitled to refuse coins and notes, and street vendors - and even churches - increasingly prefer card or telephone payments.</p><p>In November 8 of 2016, the prime minister of India has eradicated the 2 largest notes, which elevated the quantity of debit card funds by 108%. Within the radio he said Less-money first, cashless society next. There are a lot of other examples in numerous international locations, reminiscent of Denmark, the USA, and so on. There's little doubt we're dealing with a worldwide plan to destroy money.</p><p>CCTV cameras</p><p>The strongest weapon of the technological management system are positively the CCTV cameras. While you may largely keep away from all the opposite issues (at least for now), the cameras are doing their job just by current. They had been slowly being put into various places - from outlets and faculties to the streets, buses and flats; you possibly can assume that wherever you move, your life is being saved, watched and analyzed by strangers. I've known a place the place some drunks preferred to satisfy up and they put a digicam in there, which the drunks destroyed. But the next day they changed it again, so it's clearly very important to them.</p><p>The existence of the spying system utterly modifications the relations between people and the elites. You can't feel comfortable knowing that your each move is being spied on (by individuals who also can punish you should you do one thing they deem "fallacious"). Most people do not appear to care although - they purchase in shops loaded with cameras and ship their youngsters to colleges that have cameras. Some are even completely happy that they're being watched, repeating dumb slogans about "security", or other excuses that don't have anything to do with reality. But this is just the start - the effectiveness of the spying system will enhance so much that you will not be able to live the best way you all the time have. So what's the subsequent phase of this system?</p><p>Advanced cameras can do much more than just recording video and counting on the human's interpretation. They can spy on a human as he goes from one camera's vary to a different's, detect faces, mark folks based on gender or different criteria:</p><p>They may detect your behavior and mark it as doubtlessly "suspicious". That is already being used in locations like India https://www.good.com/defending/press-releases/Nanded-India-Deploys-Nice-Safe-City-Solution-to-Protect-Citizens-Visitors-and-Historical-Sites-129 (archive) (MozArchive), Glasgow https://www.good.com/defending/press-releases/Nice-Safe-City-Solutions-Deployed-in-Glasgow-to-Bolster-Security-Safety-and-Operations-Management-137 (archive) (MozArchive), and even within the Polish town Katowice http://katowice.naszemiasto.pl/artykul/katowicki-inteligentny-system-monitoringu-i-analizy-czyli,2656606,artgal,t,id,tm.html (archive) (MozArchive)</p><p>This system makes absolute slaves out of people. There is a central point by which the police can analyze all the information. One of many "suspicious behaviors" that had been being advertised by the CCTV companies was taking out a pistol from your pocket. But something in any respect might be thought-about "suspicious". Let's look at among the frequent things that I've seen being banned: promoting stuff on the streets, feeding birds, carrying a mask, strolling the canine (!), driving with out seat belts, and so on. Sometimes individuals get fined for this stuff, but they must be found out first. The intelligent monitoring system removes this requirement, letting the psychopathic elites superb anyone for anything they think about.</p><p>Imagine you're walking by means of an alley that is loaded with these cameras whereas consuming a sandwich. Then you definitely throw away the bag through which the sandwich was. A digicam sees that and assigns you a effective of 50 dollars for littering. Your face has been detected and the trail you're taking is now being watched and despatched to the police in real time. A couple of minutes later the police comes; you're making an attempt to hide however it's impossible, since there are cameras in all places, and they know your place. Ultimately, you pay up, the same as anyone who has ever littered. This could look humorous now, but the know-how exists to make this scenario a actuality, it's just a matter of implementing it. The ads for these cameras make it clear - being in the gang won't protect you. Neither will hiding your face, changing clothes, shifting somewhere, and so on. People will for certain attempt to find a solution to idiot this system, and they may even succeed originally - but the algorithms will get higher, and can ultimately make it unimaginable to idiot them.</p><p>Inventions of the longer term</p><p>There are different applied sciences, which have been lately invented, that sooner or later will gas the management system. Just about each new invention has the potential to do that (and even is invented for this reason), however I'll strive to explain an important ones.</p><p>Microchips</p><p>There is a massive marketing campaign all around the world to put chips in folks's pets, allegedly to "be able to find them", but actually the purpose is to get folks used to the idea of chipping. After which they are going to chip the folks. In some bars or workplaces they are already getting used to, for instance, open doors; after enough propaganda they are going to be injected in every little one that's born. They will change ID playing cards, credit score playing cards, and different current paperwork. They will be required in an increasing number of locations, and you won't have the ability to satisfy primary wants (equivalent to shopping) with out them. Why do the elites need to chip the people so dangerous? Because it is going to allow them to create a gigantic database containing the time and place of each person. This has already been tried in some American faculties, for example: http://www.alternet.org/civil-liberties/kids-tagged-rfid-chips-creepy-new-know-how-faculties-use-track-every thing-youngsters-do (archive) (MozArchive). The youngsters wear ID playing cards on their necks, and those playing cards have the chips in them. Their place is being despatched to the varsity computers in actual time, in addition to detecting events similar to coming into or leaving school, shopping for lunch, or coming into the library. It's only a matter of time until we all have them under our skins.</p><p>Holograms</p><p>Advertisements have been with us for a long time, even earlier than know-how. You possibly can keep away from them by putting in AdBlock or switching to a different Tv channel. But you will not be ready to cover from an advertisement displayed, for instance, on grass or the sky. I assumed that is far into the longer term before I wrote this article, however actually, this has already been tried: https://thefutureofthings.com/5069-nike-launched-a-holographic-3d-advertising-campaign/ (archive) (MozArchive) This could also be used not only to advertise merchandise, however convince folks of the fact of a sure model of occasions.</p><p>Self-driving cars</p><p>Already being examined in, for instance, California https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-02-01/tesla-is-testing-self-driving-vehicles-on-california-roads (archive) (MozArchive). And when they are going to lastly be put into roads, we are going to keep listening to about how protected they're (this already happens, but will be much more common). When people finally get convinced of the safety of these automobiles, common automobiles will likely be banned since they're allegedly much less secure than the computer-controlled ones. So we'll be capable to drive solely in line with the path the pc chooses, which will after all even be stored in the global database. Cars with no steering wheel (already exist) can even forestall fleeing from the police.</p><p>Culmination of the technological control system</p><p>The final aim of the technological management system is putting collectively all these tools to allow full control of humanity. To use the Internet, you should have to provide your real title (or maybe flash a microchip?) - so Anything we do there will be connected to our actual particular person. All encrypted connections and conversations will be decrypted on the fly and analyzed. Freely downloading torrents or even making jokes like "die in a hearth" will likely be a factor of the past. All the information you obtain will probably be controlled - much like what Facebook and Google already do, but globally.</p><p>Our physical place will probably be tracked by cameras and microchip scanners which can be in places equivalent to outlets, airports, flats, and so on. So our movements will likely be analyzed in real time - but not by individuals, like it's now, but by AI (or even robots, farther sooner or later). You will not be able to flee from this system - they'll even spy on the homeless (there have been already programs to search out and catalogue the homeless' place, allegedly to assist them, but it surely actually was about the spying). Maybe they may soon put cameras in their favorite places, if they are not already doing that. December 17 revision: heh, they're already doing that - https://techcrunch.com/2017/12/13/safety-robots-are-being-used-to-ward-off-san-franciscos-homeless-population/ (archive) (MozArchive). Didn't think it might get there so fast!</p><p>Paper cash will absolutely disappear. All our transactions might be linked to our actual name, as every little thing else. There will likely be a giant, worldwide database storing the physical position of each person, in addition to the whole lot he has ever completed, stated, wrote, bought...All his movements will, of course, be analyzed in actual time by AI. I believe the technology for all that already exists - so it is a social or logistical problem, not a technological one. How long will it take the elites to put in all that, and get folks used to slavery? I do not know. But one factor is for positive: the snug life that you're used to, will probably be solely a cheerful memory soon.</p><p>Update 2022: in some way I felt like updating this, since I believe I didn't make my essential level as effectively as I wanted to. So, think about a video sport character, like Mario. By interacting with the game, we can verify how excessive he can leap, how long does it take him to succeed in full working pace, what sorts of enemies he can stomp on and which he cannot, etc. Since Mario is just a program working on our computers / consoles, we will study all that he can do at any moment. His bounce peak is a relentless, so we will theoretically calculate whether he can hit some block, or in how a lot time (in-recreation frames) a sure enemy will attain us. Greater than that - by figuring out the particulars of the sport, we will resolve what's the very best plan of action 5 levels down the street.</p><p>That is, the truth is, how extraordinarily precise speedruns are created. For simple video games like Super Mario Bros, they are already very optimized, almost right down to a single step. But the same rules apply to even advanced video games like JRPGs. Picking up a sure item early on can assist you to do something 2 hours later. Learning a certain ability that's weak initially can allow you to kill the final boss in one hit. Running from a battle can set a RNG-dependent variable to a certain optimal value, and so on. To an everyday player, these strategies might seem silly within the quick term, but they finalize in the best possible route ultimately. It's not nearly speedruns, however any type of problem runs, and so on. would require deep knowledge and long term evaluation of the sport mechanics to carry out.</p><p>Now what if I told you that reality is the video recreation in query? Imagine - your location is already recognized by your smartphone, or car, or a web of CCTV, or a mixture of those. Your deepest darkest wishes are recognized by your serps, your community of pals by the social media companies, etc. Just this alone allows huge information, prediction and management skills (this has been described within the earlier sections). But think about we go deeper with microchips, thought readers, sensible cities and stuff like that. With increasing expertise, we develop into more like the video game character.</p><p>To achieve that level, we require three issues. First is the technology that permits us exact enough knowledge collection. Second is powerful computers that enable calculations quick sufficient to predict outputs based mostly on inputs lengthy ahead in time (what chess engines already do, however in a way more sophisticated system). The third is the expertise that enables us to push switches - the way in which a keyboard or joystick does in a video recreation system. See, we're still physical beings, dependent on things like genes expressing themselves, neurons firing, hormones coming into a cell to cause sure changes, and so on. All of this may very well be theoretically controlled by technology. Even now, with the relatively easy switches that we have, we will already cause depression in social media customers by showing them sure tales. We are able to get individuals to purchase issues because of AI-decided direct commercials, and so forth. Imagine if we get down to the extent of the cell!</p><p>And the elites are absolutely engaged on such a expertise as we speak. I imply, what do you assume the mRNA vaccines are? Now I assume some of this may very well be used positively, however it somehow by no means is in the current world, so it's a idiot's dream. The principle point is, we are going to lose our humanity either approach, when the analysis and control ability reaches Mario's degree. We will have to either resolve to inhibit such a know-how, or hand over our humanity, since e.g mendacity won't be attainable with neuron access. Hey, possibly you assume that humans will decide to give up advanced expertise. Forget about it, Ted Kaczynski has long disproved such a notion - technology develops just about by itself, without regard to human hopes and goals.</p><p>And because of this we'd like the physical infrastructure soon. If the world is managed by evil actors (as it is right now) and they have all this functionality (which we don't), including direct cell access, God help us. The upper the expertise, the larger the ability difference between us and the elites. Resistance will not be doable anymore when expertise reaches such a degree (which I'd guess takes no more than a few a long time). Imagine them being able to point out a graph of your most likely movements in keeping with the knowledge they have already got, in real time, and use it towards you. How can you resist, when the computers can predict what you are going to do on Level 6 of the truth sport - and push a swap to deny or change it? You won't ever do anything aside from what the elites (or the AI, if it is given management and goes rogue) enable. And because the technological improvement will not stop, we need to take over proper now.</p>